Run operations. Manage incidents. Make decisions.
In a governed, intelligence-led environment.
Collaborative, multi-stakeholder networks that integrate your information, people, processes and AI agents seamlessly, helping you to synthesise data and achieve fast, trusted and defensible decision advantage and compliance.
Departments are siloed. Data is fragmented. Liability is exposed.
During operations, training or incident management, the same questions arise:
- Who was present?
- What did they know?
- What did they authorise?
- What did they choose not to do?
Most organisations cannot answer these questions with certainty. The JTOC makes the answers accessible on demand.
Gartner predicts that by 2027, governance failures will force 40% of enterprises to demote or decommission autonomous AI agents - discovered only after production incidents.
Gartner, May 2026 · via CIO.com
Governing the agent is insufficient. Securing the agent is insufficient.
Both approaches focus on the agent as the unit of control. Neither governs the environment in which the agent operates - the stakeholders present, the decisions made at the time of execution, the authority exercised, the inaction evidenced. When a regulator, insurer, or court asks what happened, securing and governing the agent produces a technical log. It does not produce a defensible decision record.
The JTOC governs the entire environment in which agents and humans operate together.
Every agent, every automated action, every flow that passes through the JTOC becomes attributed, evidenced, and defensible.
Every agent action is attributed
Automated actions are logged against a verified identity. When a regulator or insurer asks what happened, the record is complete and tamper-proof.
Human authorisation is enforced
High-risk agent actions pause for human approval inside the JTOC before execution. The approval decision, and the identity of who made it, is permanently recorded.
The knowledge base compounds
Agent outputs, decisions, and outcomes are retained in the JTOC knowledge base. Every future task starts from a governed body of prior work - not from zero.
- n8n, Make, Zapier, and every agentic framework being adopted right now are execution environments with no governance layer.
- They take actions, connect to systems, and process data - with no attribution, no immutable record, and no audit trail that would satisfy a regulator or stand up in a dispute.
- Every approval and action becomes attributed, immutable, and defensible.
- The JTOC doesn't replace those tools. You do not need to discard them.
- The capability you've already built stays intact. The governance exposure disappears.
C3i with governance you can prove. In one environment.
Command and Control
A real-time operational environment where information is collated and synthesised; decisions are made, authorised, assigned and executed across teams, organisations and jurisdictions. Full situational awareness at every level.
Communication and Collaboration
Bring together internal teams, external advisers, legal counsel, insurers and regulators in a single governed workspace. Every channel, every exchange, every participant - accountable.
Governance and Evidence
Every decision, every contribution, every absence is immutably recorded and permanently attributed. The record is AI-queryable on demand by regulators, insurers, or internal audit.
From zero to operational in three steps.
Each JTOC deploys quickly and operates continuously, with generative and agentic AI supporting both internal and client projects.
Zero Trust security architecture is built in. No lengthy enterprise integration. No infrastructure build. Negligible cost of ownership.
- Deploy as standard SaaS, on private cloud infrastructure, or on-premise.
- Operational in under 10 minutes.
- Launch multiple instances to serve different clients, business departments, projects or operations.
- Each JTOC instance has its own isolated database, governable according to each unique remit.
- Create full stack corporate or multi-jurisdictional decision infrastructure and switch between instances seamlessly.
- Connect your data sources. Upload your documents (policies, SOPs, guidelines, research).
- Configure your intelligence feeds and your AI agents.
- Connect your external (mass) communication channels, including MS Outlook, WhatsApp and Slack.
- Define your stakeholder groups and set access controls.
- Invite colleagues and supporting personnel, including the executive team, legal counsel, insurers, client POCs.
- Every invitation is a governed act recorded in the audit trail.
- Query your intelligence in natural language.
- Collaborate across stakeholders in a governed environment.
- The system scores source credibility, surfaces confidence, and builds an immutable record of every decision made on the basis of it.
- Every contribution, every absence, every authorisation is permanently attributed.
From frontline teams to the boardroom.
Field Teams and Duty Officers
Real-time coordination during live incidents. Shared situational awareness with full attribution of who knew what, when.
Head of Security and CISO
Cross-functional decision-making with governance. Every authorisation, escalation, and handoff is permanently recorded.
Legal, Insurers and Regulators
Reconstructable evidence of governance at any future point. Proof that decisions were informed, authorised, and documented.
Infrastructure that is always on, so you build powerful organisational memory.
The JTOC is not incident-response software that you only activate when something goes wrong.
It is steady-state infrastructure that governs every decision, every day. When an incident occurs, the governance record already exists. When a regulator asks questions, the evidence is already complete. When details of a previous project need to be recalled, knowledge is retained, attributed, searchable, and actionable.
Most governance tools require manual activation, manual documentation, and manual compliance. The JTOC inverts this model. Governance is the default state. Every interaction, every decision, every piece of intelligence that enters the workspace is automatically attributed, timestamped, and made permanently queryable.
Built for the regulatory and security landscape ahead.
Regulatory frameworks increasingly require organisations to demonstrate not just what they did, but how decisions were governed. DORA mandates ICT incident governance. NIS2 requires documented decision-making during cyber events. SM&CR holds individuals accountable for decisions within their scope.
The JTOC provides the evidence infrastructure these frameworks demand.
11 threats the JTOC mitigates - through architecture not documents.
| Threat | Description | JTOC Mitigation |
|---|---|---|
| Prompt Injection | Malicious input crafted to manipulate an LLM into bypassing its instructions, surfacing unauthorised information, or producing unintended outputs — whether through a direct query or an automated agent action. | The JTOC is the governed environment in which humans and agents operate under defined Commander's Intent. Every query and action is attributed and logged. The authority structure and operational boundaries are defined in advance by the human commander — manipulation of the model does not change what was authorised, and the immutable record evidences any deviation from it. |
| Credential and Session Hijacking | Stolen credentials used to authenticate as a legitimate user, with the system trusting everything that follows. | The JTOC operates beyond the authentication layer. Even with valid credentials, all actions within the governed environment are executed against a pre-defined authority structure. What a stolen credential cannot replicate is the Commander's Intent and authority boundaries already established in the record. Every action taken under compromised credentials is attributed, logged, and reconstructable. |
| Model Poisoning | Training data or fine-tuning inputs are manipulated to corrupt model behaviour at inference time. | The JTOC does not prevent model poisoning. Where a compromised model operates within the JTOC environment, its outputs — whether produced in response to a human query or an agent operating under Commander's Intent — are attributed, logged, and reconstructable, providing an audit trail for investigation but not a control against the poisoning itself. |
| Compromised Third-Party Intelligence | External intelligence sources feeding into the decision environment are manipulated, corrupted, or compromised, producing decisions based on bad data. | The JTOC records the intelligence base against which every decision and agent action was taken. Commander's Intent is set against the intelligence available at the time — if a source is later found to have been compromised, the decisions and actions taken on its basis are fully reconstructable and auditable. The JTOC does not sanitise incoming intelligence — it ensures that whatever was known at the moment of decision is on record, attributed, and defensible. |
| Agentic Overreach | An AI agent acquires permissions or takes actions beyond its intended scope, either through misconfiguration or manipulation. | Within the JTOC, agents operate under Commander's Intent — authority structures and operational boundaries defined in advance by the human commander. Agents execute autonomously within that intent. Actions that fall outside the defined boundaries are evidenced as deviations in the immutable record, attributable and reconstructable on demand. |
| Data Exfiltration via AI Systems | An LLM or automated system is used to extract sensitive data at scale through direct access or inference — whether by an agent operating under Commander's Intent or a human exploiting the model's capabilities. | Every query and data retrieval action within the JTOC environment is logged, attributed, and permanently recorded — regardless of whether it was initiated by a human or an agent. Each instance operates on an isolated namespace. The authority structure defined by the commander determines what data agents and users are sanctioned to access. |
| Data Sovereignty and Cross-Client Exposure | Sensitive operational data is exposed across client environments, or leaves the control of the organisation that owns it. | Each JTOC instance operates on a fully isolated database. Clients bring their own data, their own models, and their own keys. The LLM is pointed only at that instance's data — there is no cross-client exposure by architecture. Full sovereign deployment is supported, with the option to run entirely on the organisation's own infrastructure, ensuring data never leaves their control. |
| Insider Threat and Authority Abuse | A legitimate user with valid access takes actions they are not authorised to take, or exceeds their remit — whether directly or by directing agents beyond their sanctioned authority. | The JTOC's permanent attribution record covers both direct human actions and actions taken by agents operating under a user's Commander's Intent. Misuse is evidenced, not just suspected. The record shows who set the intent, what boundaries were defined, what was executed within them, and what fell outside. |
| Stakeholder Absence During Critical Decisions | Key decision-makers are absent during critical incidents, creating governance gaps and liability exposure. | The JTOC evidences who was present, who was absent, and who chose not to act. Where agents operate under Commander's Intent during an incident, the record shows who set that intent, when, and on the basis of what intelligence. Silence and absence are evidenced, not assumed. |
| AI-Assisted Social Engineering | Deepfakes, synthetic voice, and AI-generated communications make impersonation attacks faster and more convincing. | The JTOC does not try to detect the deception. Even if social engineering influences a commander's intent or a human decision, that intent and decision is permanently attributed to the person who set it, against the intelligence available at the time, within a governed record. The deception does not erase accountability. |
| Governance Failure Under Regulatory Investigation | Organisations cannot reconstruct what happened, who knew what, and what was decided during an incident — by humans or the agents operating under their direction. | The JTOC makes full reconstruction available on demand — who set the Commander's Intent, what intelligence was available, what agents were directed to do, what was executed, and what was not. Every action, human or automated, is attributed and permanently queryable by regulators, insurers, or internal audit. |
Six scenarios. One solution.
Regulatory investigation
Reconstruct exactly who was present, what intelligence was available, and what decisions were made during any incident window.
Insurance claim defence
Provide immutable evidence that your organisation responded appropriately, with the right people, using the right information.
Live incident coordination
Coordinate across legal, cyber, HR, PR, and operations with automatic governance. No manual minute-taking required.
Board and executive reporting
Generate AI-powered summaries of incident response for board reporting, with full attribution and timeline reconstruction.
Non-regulated sectors
Even without regulatory obligation, the JTOC provides the governance infrastructure that insurers increasingly expect and investors reward.
Cross-organisational response
Bring external advisers, insurers, and regulators into a governed workspace without compromising internal security boundaries.
Your infrastructure. Your rules.
Sovereign architecture
Deploy on your infrastructure. Your data never leaves your environment.
White-label channel
Include the JTOC, under your own brand, as part of your risk management services portfolio, to help reduce your and your clients' liability exposure, simultaneously.
Osinto identity layer
Leverage the Osinto identity and verification infrastructure for participant authentication and attribution.
MCP-compatible
Model Context Protocol compatibility for integration with AI agents, copilots, and automated decision-support systems.
From the people who need it most.
“We needed to prove to our insurer that the right people were in the room and that decisions were documented in real time. The JTOC gave us that evidence without changing how we actually work.”
Head of Security, Financial Services
“During a live incident, the last thing you want is to worry about governance. The JTOC handles it silently in the background. When the regulator asked questions six months later, we had everything.”
CISO, Critical Infrastructure